DDactic vs LODDOS
A full recon-to-hardening DDoS resilience platform with 13 passive intelligence sources vs. a managed flood testing service.
About LODDOS
LODDOS is a DDoS testing service focused on volumetric flood testing. Their service allows organizations to test how their infrastructure handles high-volume traffic attacks from an external source. Engagements are managed by their team, with customers specifying the targets and parameters for the test.
LODDOS occupies the simpler end of the DDoS testing market: focused on flood testing at scale, with less emphasis on passive reconnaissance, attack surface discovery, or the full range of application-layer attack vectors. For organizations that specifically need to validate how their infrastructure handles large volumetric floods, this narrower focus can be appropriate.
DDactic vs. LODDOS
Side-by-side comparison based on publicly available information from both companies.
| Feature | DDactic | LODDOS |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery model | Self-service SaaS | Managed flood testing service |
| Attack surface discovery | 13-source passive recon | Customer-specified targets |
| Origin IP / CDN-bypass detection | Automatic | No |
| Volumetric L3/L4 flooding | Yes | Core focus |
| L7 application-layer simulation | Yes - 233+ vectors | Limited |
| Source diversity | 24 cloud providers | Limited public info |
| Non-disruptive | Gradual escalation | Varies |
| Self-service access | Yes | Engagement required |
| Hardening / remediation output | CLI commands + config steps | Post-test report |
| Free tier | Free attack surface scan | No |
| Pricing | Public pricing from $2,500 | Per-engagement, contact sales |
Comparison based on publicly available information from loddos.com and DDactic's platform. Last updated October 2026.
Where LODDOS Excels
High-Volume Flood Testing
LODDOS focuses on volumetric flood testing at scale. If your primary concern is understanding whether your upstream transit capacity and scrubbing center can absorb large volumetric attacks, a service focused on that specific scenario can be appropriate.
Simpler Engagement Model
For organizations that want a straightforward test - specify targets, run flood, observe results - LODDOS's narrower scope means less complexity. Not every security team needs a full recon-to-hardening platform for every test.
DDactic Is the Right Choice If...
- You want to know your full attack surface, not just test the IPs you already know
- You need L7 application-layer coverage alongside volumetric testing
- You want to find out if your CDN is actually hiding your origin, or if it can be bypassed
- You want self-service access without scheduling an engagement
- You need hardening commands to fix issues found, not just a report showing problems
- You want continuous testing as your infrastructure evolves
See all comparisons: DDactic vs DDoS Testing Vendors